I opted out.
Heading through security at Louis Armstrong International this afternoon, I was selected for a full-body scan after putting my items in five trays (laptop bin, shoes and plastic bag with liquids bin, coat bin, carry-on bin, and messenger bag bin). Over a dozen people in front of me were not sent through the full-body scanner.
Overall, the crowds and lines were remarkably thin, so I didn't feel I would be an extreme hold-up to the boarding process.
I was sent through the regular metal scanner after stating that I would prefer not to be scanned and then being warned of the implications of not proceeding through the much larger full-body scanner. Then, after my bins were collected and put off on the side, I was given a full pat-down (I was offered a private frisk, but I decided that would be even creepier).
It was awkward. And, in turn, I tried to make it as awkward for the person screening me as I could - I just looked at him sort of stone-faced and gave perfunctory answers, as if to say "What the hell are you doing?" and express my regret that it has come to this.
It did seem like I was being violated without any cause for suspicion. It certainly felt that way - especially the second time he worked his hands down my thigh.
If I thought that the full body scanner or pat-downs would actually improve security, I might change my stance. But as things stand, I don't.
Taken together, I thought the frisk was unreasonable.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated"
11.24.2010
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
|